You are aware that
UFBU signed the minutes with IBA for increase of Rs.4816
crores wef 01/11/2007 (Rs. 2239 crores for officers and Rs.2576
crores for workmen employees)". Moreover, for offering 2nd
option for pension, it is said that bankers have to bear the
cost of Rs.1800 crores.
Now, let us see how IBA
is playing and squeezing the unions and the bankers. We
are of the view that the bank employees should not be asked to
pay any amount towards the cost of offering 2nd option for
option, rather they may be paid some additional amount.
This is based on the
simple calculations. Our union leaders are either totally
zero in calculations or are in hand in glove with the IBA.
Now let us suppose the
salaries had been increased w.e.f. 01/11/2007 i.e. from the due
date itself, then banks would have to shell out Rs.4816 crores
per year from that date itself. We are sure that
banks have utilized these funds for lending to borrowers in the
market, and normally these are lent not below the BPLR rate
which ranges from 11% to 15% in different banks. Even if
we take that these have been lent at only 12% p.a., then banks
have already earned more than Rs.1800 crores (See the
calculations below):-
Total Amount of Increase
per year |
(Rs. Crores) |
|
4816.00 |
|
Total amount of increase
per month |
(Rs. Crores) |
|
401.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
(say 400 crs.) |
|
Month When Arrears |
Amount of Increase |
Cumulative Amount (Rs
Crs.) |
ROI |
Intt
for One month in Rs Crores |
|
Not Paid |
Not Paid (Rs. crs.) |
Not Paid |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01 November 2007 |
400 |
400 |
12 |
4.00 |
|
01 December 2007 |
400 |
800 |
12 |
8.00 |
|
01 January 2008 |
400 |
1200 |
12 |
12.00 |
|
01 February 2008 |
400 |
1600 |
12 |
16.00 |
|
01 March 2008 |
400 |
2000 |
12 |
20.00 |
|
01 April 2008 |
400 |
2400 |
12 |
24.00 |
|
01 May 2008 |
400 |
2800 |
12 |
28.00 |
|
01 June 2008 |
400 |
3200 |
12 |
32.00 |
|
01 July 2008 |
400 |
3600 |
12 |
36.00 |
|
01 August 2008 |
400 |
4000 |
12 |
40.00 |
|
01 September 2008 |
400 |
4400 |
12 |
44.00 |
|
01 October 2008 |
400 |
4800 |
12 |
48.00 |
|
01 November 2008 |
400 |
5200 |
12 |
52.00 |
|
01 December 2008 |
400 |
5600 |
12 |
56.00 |
|
01 January 2009 |
400 |
6000 |
12 |
60.00 |
|
01 February 2009 |
400 |
6400 |
12 |
64.00 |
|
01 March 2009 |
400 |
6800 |
12 |
68.00 |
|
01 April 2009 |
400 |
7200 |
12 |
72.00 |
|
01 May 2009 |
400 |
7600 |
12 |
76.00 |
|
01 June 2009 |
400 |
8000 |
12 |
80.00 |
|
01 July 2009 |
400 |
8400 |
12 |
84.00 |
|
01 August 2009 |
400 |
8800 |
12 |
88.00 |
|
01 September 2009 |
400 |
9200 |
12 |
92.00 |
|
01 October 2009 |
400 |
9600 |
12 |
96.00 |
|
01 November 2009 |
400 |
10000 |
12 |
100.00 |
|
01 December 2009 |
400 |
10400 |
12 |
104.00 |
|
01 January 2010 |
400 |
10800 |
12 |
108.00 |
|
01 February 2010 |
400 |
11200 |
12 |
112.00 |
|
01 March 2010 |
400 |
11600 |
12 |
116.00 |
|
01 April 2010 |
400 |
12000 |
13 |
130.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GRAND TOTAL |
|
|
|
1870.00 |
|
The above clearly shows
that banks have already earned sufficient funds and are in a
position to bear the additional cost of 2nd option to banker as
they have delayed the settlement intentionally.
All Bankers
need to protest and tell their leaders that no additional burden
should be put on them for 2nd option. This is the
legitimate demand and IBA should be convinced that banks need to
pay this amount.
If necessary,
UFBU should consider going to court or for arbitration, where it
is felt that this genuine demand will be upheld.
|