NEW PENSION SCHEME – HOW DOES IT COMPARE WITH THE OLD ONE?
by
V Subramanian
Ads by Google
Important Features
Old Pension Scheme
New Pension Scheme
Intricacies and Implications
Employee’s Contribution
On the
aggregate of Basic Pay, Special Pay and other allowances ranking for P.F,
10% has to be contributed by the employee. This will be kept in the Individual’s P.F.
account.
On the
aggregate of Basic Pay, Special Pay and other allowances ranking for P.F.
and also Dearness Allowance, 10% has to be contributed by the
employee.
There
will no longer be any P.F. account. The take home pay of the employee
will get reduced, because of the additional amount deducted (10% on
D.A.).
Bank’s Contribution
Bank will
contribute an equal amount, matching the employee’s contribution. This will be kept in another account
separately and balances in this account will become the corpus fund to
service the future pension of the employee. But, most of the
banks state this amount alone is not sufficient to service the
pensions. There is a huge uncovered deficit .
Bank will
contribute an equal amount, matching the employee’s contribution. Both employee’s contribution and the bank’s
contribution will be clubbed and kept in a single account. Balances in
this account will be invested in pension funds.
Because
of higher contribution by the bank, the Pension Corpus Fund will be much
larger.
Additional Contribution from the employee
Employees
can voluntarily contribute an additional amount that is equal to the
compulsory P.F. Employees have the freedom to stop VPF contribution,
as and when they want, by giving 1 month notice.
Tier II account is a voluntary saving facility, wherein the
subscriber is permitted to save any additional amount. Withdrawals
from Tier II Account are allowed, as per the subscriber's choice.
From Tier II account, unlimited number of withdrawals are permitted,
with the only condition that a minimum balance of Rs 2000 is maintained
at the end of the Financial Year (i.e. as on 31st March).
Where the funds will be invested?
(a) 40%
of the PF funds will be invested in Government securities and Government
guaranteed securities. (b) Another 30% will be invested in Bonds and
Securities of Public Financial Institutions which include public sector
banks and Short Term Deposits of public sector banks. (c) The remaining
30% of the funds may be invested in any of the above-mentioned
securities. (d) Notwithstanding the above, up to 10% of the total funds
may be invested in
private sector bonds/securities, which have an investment grade rating
from at least two credit rating agencies.
Banks do
not have total transparency nor consistency with regard to their
investment policies and decisions made, insofar as the P.F. funds, as of
now.
As
regards investments made out of Bank’s contribution, nothing is known.
Each of the PFMs will invest the funds in the proportion of 85% in fixed
income instruments and 15% in equity and equity linked mutual funds.
There are
3 types of funds in which subscribers can invest.
They are
1. Asset Class ‘E’ – Equity Market instruments 2. Asset Class ‘G’ –
Government Securities 3. Asset Class ‘C’ – Credit Risk bearing Fixed
Income instruments.
A
subscriber has got a choice to switch between schemes and change the
fund manager too, if his performance is not satisfactory.
Since the
funds are invested in bonds and securities, their prices and their
earning potential have high degree of volatility.
Fixed
income securities are also not free from market risks, one must
remember.
Though it is claimed that professional fund managers will take decisions
with regard to investment of the funds, ordinary subscribers do not have
sufficient time and requisite knowledge to understand such investment
decisions and question the fund managers. How far the assured 100%
transparency in the functions of the pension fund manager will be
maintained is also a moot question.
Ads by Google
Important
Features
Old Pension
Scheme
New Pension
Scheme
Intricacies
and
Implications
Who will
Manage the
Funds?
At present,
a P.F. Trust
comprising
of members
drawn from
the
management,
award staff
union and
officers’
union manage
the funds.
They meet at
fixed
intervals
and take
decisions
with regard
to
investments,
roll
over/extension,
withdrawal,
loans and
final
payment on
VRS/CRS/
Superannuation.
ICICI
Prudential
Pension
Funds
Management
Company Ltd,
IDFC Pension
Fund
Management
Company Ltd,
Kotak
Mahindra
Pension Fund
Ltd,
Reliance
Capital
Pension Fund
Ltd, SBI
Pension
Funds
Private
Limited and
UTI
Retirement
Solutions
Ltd are the
6 fund
managers
approved by
PFRDA.
It is
difficult to
forecast the
efficiency
in the
performance
of the fund
managers.
Having only
6 fund
managers
makes it a
risky
proposition.
If we take
into account
the working
population
of India,
this number
is very
less. As
the number
of
subscribers
increases,
hopefully
the
government
will allow
more players
in this
filed.
Regulatory
Agency
As of now,
there is no
separate
agency at
the national
level for
overseeing
P.F. funds.
Multiple
agencies
like
Regional
Provident
Fund
Commissioners,
Company Law
Board (in
case of
companies)
and Ministry
of Labour
are
overseeing
the
administration
of PF funds.
The courts
having
jurisdiction
will hear
all the
cases and
disputes, as
per the
provisions
contained in
The
Provident
Funds Act,
1925.
Pension Fund
Regulatory
and
Development
Authority (PFRDA)
is the
regulatory
body. PFRDA
was
established
by
Government
of India on
23rd
August,
2003. The
government
has through
an executive
order dated
10th
October,
2003
mandated
PFRDA to act
as a
regulator
for the
pension
sector. The
mandate of
PFRDA is
development
and
regulation
of pension
sector in
India.
NSDL
e-Governance
Infrastructure
Limited and
PFRDA have
entered into
an agreement
relating to
the setting
up of a
Central
Recordkeeping
Agency (CRA)
for the
National
Pension
System
(NPS).
The extent
of autonomy
enjoyed by
PFRDA is yet
to be
tested. In
case of
default or
malpractices
noticed,
whether
PFRDA has
necessary
punitive
powers and
if so, to
what extent
they are
effective
are yet to
be known.
Fees/Charges
deducted
There are no
charges
deducted.
Even the
administrative
expenses
like
postage,
stationery,
telephones,
electricity
and rent are
absorbed by
the bank.
As there is
no full time
member for
the P.F.
trust, no
salaries are
paid to
them.
This way, no
additional
cost is
passed on to
the
subscriber.
Following
costs are to
be borne by
the
Subscribers
at the time
of
registration
and/or
performing
any
transaction.
The
contribution
will be
remitted, net
of bank
charges.
Fixed cost:
One-time
account
opening cost
and issuance
of PRAN –
Rs.50
Initial
subscriber
registration
and
contribution
upload –
Rs.40
Annual
maintenance
charges –
Rs.225
Variable
cost:
PoPs can now
charge Rs
100 plus
0.25 per
cent of the
investment,
as against a
flat fee of
Rs 20
earlier.
Annual
custodian
charge -
0.0075-0.05
per cent of
the fund
value
Annual fund
management
charge -
0.0102 per
cent of the
fund value
NPS is
touted as
the
lowest cost
pension
scheme.
Other
handling and
administrative
charges are
also claimed
to be the
lowest.
There are no
entry and
exit loads.
But, it
remains to
be seen how
the actual
costs move
in the
future.
With
inflation,
the costs
may go up
further.
When more
pension fund
managers
enter the
fray and the
subscriber
base also
expands
vastly, the
charges may
also come
down in
future.
Whatever be
the charges,
they result
in
diminution
of the
pension
wealth.
Important Features
Old Pension Scheme
New Pension Scheme
Intricacies and Implications
Anticipated Returns from the investments
There is
no minimum assured return. Many banks offer less than the maximum
interest rate paid on Term Deposits of staff members. Quite often, the
interest paid on P.F. in banks is lower than the interest paid by EPO of
the central government. However, positive returns are assured and
there is no way that the principal gets eroded. As on date,
interest at 8.5% p.a. is being paid on the subscription made by the
employee and the employer, in most of the banks.
There is
no minimum guaranteed return in NPS.
Depending
on the performance of the various pension funds in the years to come,
the appreciation in the fund value will vary and it cannot be forecast
right now.
Since the
returns are market determined, the risks associated cannot be avoided.
NPS has delivered 5 to 12 per cent annual returns in the past three
years. Due to the market downturn, the return from the equity portfolio
has been the lowest (around 5 per cent), while the Asset Class C has
returned up to 12 per cent a year.
However,
we shall not forget the fact that even in developed economies, NAV of
several pension funds has come down below par value, resulting in huge
loss to the subscribers, either due economic depression or mismanagement
of the pension funds.
Loans
Loans may
be availed for various purposes, within the limit fixed for each
purpose, as per the guidelines fixed by individual banks.
Loan
facility is not available.
Even in
emergency situations, an employee cannot borrow against his own
contribution.
Withdrawals while in service
Non-refundable withdrawals from individual contributions are permitted
for purposes like -
(a)
purchase of vacant plot and construction of a house thereon
(b)
outright purchase of a house/flat
(c)
marriage of children and
(d)
medical expenses in connection with treatment of major ailments subject
to certain conditions on limits, length of service etc.
At any
point of time, before 60 years of age, 80% of the pension wealth is to
be invested in a life annuity scheme from any IRDA regulated life
insurance company namely,
Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), SBI Life Insurance, ICICI
Prudential Life Insurance, Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance, Star Union Dai-ichi
and Reliance Life Insurance.
The
remaining 20% of the pension wealth may be withdrawn as lump sum. On
the amount withdrawn too, tax has to be paid.
This
negative clause acts as a dampener to those who want to take VRS before
attaining 60 years. It takes away the freedom of choices available to
the subscribers.
Since the NPS is meant for retirement and financial security, it does
not permit flexible withdrawals as are possible in the case of mutual
funds.
Withdrawals after retirement
The
individual’s contribution, along with accumulated interest, will be paid
back to the employee. The employer’s contribution along with the
interest thereon will be utilised to build up the corpus for payment of
monthly pension to the employee for the rest of his life.
Between
60 and 70 years, not less than 40% of the pension wealth is to be
invested in annuity and the balance can be withdrawn in instalments or
as a lump sum by the employee. In case
of phased withdrawal, minimum of 10% of the pension wealth should be
withdrawn every year. On
attaining the age of 70 years, the amount lying to the credit of the
subscriber should be compulsorily withdrawn in lump sum.
After
attaining 60 years too, one does not have the freedom to withdraw his
own contribution i.e. up to 50% of the pension wealth. Thus, much of
the lifetime savings of the employee gets locked up in annuity, much
against his wish. It is a major setback to the senior citizens and it
is a great injustice. Pensioners aged between 60 and 70 years are the
worst affected.
Important Features
Old Pension Scheme
New Pension Scheme
Intricacies and Implications
Payment
on the death of the subscriber, before retirement
If the
subscriber dies before retirement, his individual contribution to P.F.
with the accrued interest is paid to the nominee. Bank’s contribution
is retained to service Family Pension.
In the
unfortunate event of the death of the subscriber, option will be
available to the nominee to either receive 100% of the pension wealth in
lump sum or to continue with the NPS in his individual capacity, after
complying with the KYC norms.
Most of
the legal heirs of the deceased employee will be compelled to accept the
lump sum only, as they do not derive any extra benefit by
continuing in the scheme.
Payment
on the death of the subscriber, after retirement
If the
pensioner dies after retirement, the spouse receives family pension at
reduced rates as discussed above. In case of dependent son/daughter,
family pension is payable to him/her till he/she attains the age of 25
years or starts earning Rs.2,550 per month whichever occurs earlier.
Same as above.
Same as above.
Amount of
Pension paid
The
pension payable is linked to the average pay drawn during the last 10
months of service. Besides, D.A. is also paid on the Basic Pension, even
after commutation. These rates are decided at the time of each wage
revision settlement.
The value of the annuity purchased at the time of retirement will
determine the amount of monthly pension. Monthly pension under NPS is a
fixed amount and it will attract any D.A. and therefore, in case of rise
in AICPI, no additional benefit will accrue to the pensioner.
Over a period of time, the value of pension amount will diminish in real
terms, due to inflation.
Therefore, pension received under NPS is not at all beneficial to the
pensioner during his life time, as compared to the pension under the old
scheme.
Family
Pension
Besides,
the spouse of the deceased is paid family pension at a reduced rate
(which ranges from 15% to 30% of the Basic pension payable).
No family pension is paid, after the death of the subscriber/pensioner.
Only the pension wealth in lump sum is paid.
The
dependents of the pensioner do not receive any family pension which
attracts D.A. It may please be noted that D.A. also stands revised
periodically, whenever there is a rise in consumer price index.
Income
Tax Benefits
For
Individual Employees contributing to the NPS, their investment is
eligible for deduction from Income under Section 80-CCD(1) of the Income
Tax Act, 1961. However, the aggregate of all investments under Section
80-C and the premium on pension products on Section 80CCC should not
exceed Rs.1 lakh per assessment year to claim for the deduction.
Under Section 80-CCD(2) of Income Tax Act, if an employer contributes
10% of the salary (basic salary plus dearness allowance) to the
NPS account of the employee, that amount gets tax exemption of up to Rs
1 lakh. However, this is within the overall limit of Rs.1 lakh for
all eligible investments put together under Sec.80-C.
Though the employer also gets tax benefit under Section 36 I (IV) A for
his contribution, it hardly makes any difference for the employees.
Moreover, for an employee who has already exhausted his full limit of
Rs.1 Lakh for investments under Sec.80-C, contributions made to NPS
under Sec.80-CCD(1) do not confer any extra benefit.
Income
tax liability
No tax is
deducted on loans, partial withdrawals (non-refundable) while in service
and total withdrawal after retirement.
On
retirement, 60% of the savings may be withdrawn in cash and it is
taxable. The remaining 40% will have to be invested in a
Pension/Annuity Fund and it is tax free (at the time of investment).
At the time of withdrawal, the lump sum would be taxable as per the
individual’s tax slab. It is a case of EET (exempt on contributions
made, exempt on accumulation, taxed on maturity) unlike EPF, PPF which
are EEE (exempt, exempt, exempt). Hence, the tax liability will be
huge at the time of withdrawing the funds.
Important Features
Old Pension Scheme
New Pension Scheme
Intricacies and Implications
Simplicity of procedures
The
existing procedures are very simple, easy to understand and easy to
follow. The employer does most of the jobs for the employees.
Since all
the transactions are done online, they can be easily tracked. But, the
burden of tracking one’s investments falls on the subscriber.
Since the
systems and procedures are complex, employees will face difficulties and
inconvenience throughout their life. It is difficult to evaluate and
choose the fund manager and also the scheme to invest. Moreover, people
cannot take right decisions with regard to switching from one fund to
another, even though such facility is available.
Why NPS is not popular?
Main reason = Low Commission
Because NPS
offers very low Commission to Fund managers (ICICI, SBI, UTI etc.)
So those
players (ICICI, SBI) rather prefer to market their own pension, insurance,
retirement plans rather than promoting NPS among their (regular) bank
customers.
Same goes for
financial advisor, insurance agents etc. They get more Commission by
promoting pension/insurance/retirement plans of private companies to their
clients, compared to NPS.
Why NPS does not compare favourably with old Pension Scheme?
Tax Implications
Income Tax
benefits under NPS are not significantly higher than the existing investment
options.
Similarly,
the ‘Exempt, Exempt, Tax’ (EET) under NPS is a great discouraging factor.
Other reasons
In NPS, there
are multiple actors: POPs, PFRDA, CRA and fund managers.
NPS doesn’t
offer uniform rate of return.
Common people
find this setup difficult and unsecure, unlike tried and trusted LIC or PPF.
NPS is not
spending lot of money on ads with film stars / cricketers.
As far as structure and cost are concerned, NPS is the best retirement
option. But people are reluctant to invest in NPS, due to taxation and
liquidity issues. Mutual funds score over NPS in both these aspects, which
is why financial advisors have reservations in recommending the product.
You can give your feedback / comments
about this Article. Please give only
relevant comments as irrelevant comments are
waste of time for yourself and our other
readers.