 |
|
||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
Follow AllBankingSolutions @ 
|
2nd Meeting for Negotitions for 10th
BPS Now Postponed
Ads by Google
by
Rajesh Goyal
In the first meeting held on 22nd February, 2013, IBA had agreed to hold the
next meeting on 4th March, 2013. In my article I have shown my happiness
as I felt that UFBU and IBA appears to be a bit serious about holding of 10th
bipartite negotiations on a regular basis, as the next meeting was scheduled to
be held on 4th March, 2013 i.e. after 10 days. I felt to start with
a meeting within 10 days is a good beginning.
However, now reports indicate that IBA has postponed the meeting and UFBU has no
clues even for the next meeting. It appears IBA is again back on the
old trick of delaying and derailing the negotiation process. Bankers
have to be be aware of the same. Now, you may not be surprised if
IBA and UFBU party take another 10 days to decide the next date, which may than
be held after another 10 - 15 days from the date of announcement.
This means a gap of almost 1 month.
Ads by Google
I can only hope better
senses will prevail and UFBU will keep up the pressure and ensure that there is
never a gap of more than 10 days between two meetings. We too will monitor
the same and request bankers to be vigilant, as you people are the biggest
losers for delays. We intend to keep a track of the
developments in this tabular format so that full transparency is maintained, and
IBA and UFBU are not able to make a fool of the bankers this time.
Meeting No.
Date of Meeting
Fixed for 10th BPS
Major
Discussions / Achievements (The 10th BPS has become due wef 1st
November, 2012)
Remarks, if any
1
22nd February, 2013
The Chairman of the Negotiating Committee Shri.T.M.Bhasin, the CMD of
the Indian Bank himself assured that the meetings would be held at a
stretch so that the entire process of the 10th Bipartite can
be concluded on time. Next meeting fixed for 4th
March, 2013.
There was a strike on 20th and 21st February, 2013, which was
purely political in nature and had nothing to do with demands for wage
revision. The first meeting was held on the next date of
this strike, almost after 4 months of submission of Charter of Demands
by UFBU. However, bankers felt satisfied that at least a
beginning has been done and next meeting has been scheduled early
2
4th March, 2013
Meeting Postponed on behest of IBA due to so called
unavoidable circumstances (No details given). Next date of meeting
was not announced on the same day by IBA / UFBU
Uncertainty about next date of meeting and delay is now ensured.
Will result in gloom among bankers.
You can give your feedback / comments about this Article. Please give only relevant comments as irrelevant comments are
waste of time for yourself and our other readers.
blog comments powered by Disqus
|
Ads by Google by
Rajesh Goyal
In the first meeting held on 22nd February, 2013, IBA had agreed to hold the next meeting on 4th March, 2013. In my article I have shown my happiness as I felt that UFBU and IBA appears to be a bit serious about holding of 10th bipartite negotiations on a regular basis, as the next meeting was scheduled to be held on 4th March, 2013 i.e. after 10 days. I felt to start with a meeting within 10 days is a good beginning. However, now reports indicate that IBA has postponed the meeting and UFBU has no clues even for the next meeting. It appears IBA is again back on the old trick of delaying and derailing the negotiation process. Bankers have to be be aware of the same. Now, you may not be surprised if IBA and UFBU party take another 10 days to decide the next date, which may than be held after another 10 - 15 days from the date of announcement. This means a gap of almost 1 month.
Ads by Google I can only hope better senses will prevail and UFBU will keep up the pressure and ensure that there is never a gap of more than 10 days between two meetings. We too will monitor the same and request bankers to be vigilant, as you people are the biggest losers for delays. We intend to keep a track of the developments in this tabular format so that full transparency is maintained, and IBA and UFBU are not able to make a fool of the bankers this time.
|
