Stalemate in Negotiations - Great Strategy of
UFBU for Delaying Tactics
by
Rajesh Goyal
Ads by Google
After a wait of over 36 hours, I have come across the details
of the discussions that took place on 13th June, 2014.
In case one wishes to read the circular in continuous mode, you
can
click here
or else stay here and read the contents alongwith
analysis of ABS in the tabular format as given below :-
After the last round of negotiations held on 14-3-2014, another round of
discussions took place with IBA on 13-6-2014 in Mumbai in the background of the
new Government taking over at the Centre after the general elections. The
details of the meeting are give below alongwith remarks of
AllBankingSolutions.com
What Does Circular Reads
Summary / Remarks by AllBankingSolutions.com
UFBU meeting: Prior to the discussions with the IBA,
meeting of the UFBU was held. The meeting observed a minutes' silence to
pay homage on the death of Dr Shanti Patel, veteran trade union leader
of HMS and Port and Dock Workers. The meeting took stock of the
developments since our last meeting held in March, 2014. The meeting
welcomed the new Government under the Prime Ministership of Shri
Narendra Modi and hoped that the basic problems of the people and
workers would be addressed by the new Government. The meeting noted that
in addition to the pending demands of UFBU for wage revision, there are
other challenges too like the recommendations of P J Nayak Committee,
talks of dilution of Government's capital in Banks, merger of Banks,
etc. The meeting decided to take a delegation of UFBU to the Finance
Minister to apprise him of our issues and demands.
I was expecting that in the meeting prior to discussions with IBA, UFBU
leaders would have discussed about the strategies to be adopted to
counter IBA and how to cut the delays in the finalisation of BPS. I
am shocked that instead of focusing on the wage hike, UFBU leaders
appear to have focused on other issues which they feel to be much more
important than honorable wage hike. They seems to be more worried
about recommendations of P J Nayak Committee than wage hike for bankers.
I wonder if they had to make a
strategy for countering Nayak Committee report in a meeting, what
stopped them even during election period and after the declaration of
elections results to deliberate on such an issue?
These appear to be nothing but diverting tactics or at best to
settle their political goals.
They seem to have lost an opportunity to discuss various strategies so
as to get the bankers an honorable wage settlement.
Discussions with IBA:
(1)
In the wage revision talks, the IBA was represented by Mr. T M Bhasin,
Chairman of the Negotiating Committee along with other members. UFBU was
represented by all the Constituent Unions.
Opening up the discussions, Mr. Bhasin explained the present banking
scenario where the profits of the Banks have come down as on 31-3-2014
adding to the constraints of the Banks to take up any huge financial
burden in the form of wages. After submissions from UFBU, IBA informed
that they are willing to improve their offer from earlier 10% to 11% on
the cost of Pay Slip components of the wage bill which would amount to
Rs.3,465 crores and which would be exclusive of other costs on
retirement benefits, LFC, hospitalization expenses, etc. From UFBU, we
expressed our inability to accept this offer as the same was quite
inadequate.
(2)
Since UFBU refused to accept the IBA's offer of 11% increase, IBA wanted
to know the expectation of the UFBU for which it was informed that our
minimum expectation is 25% increase in the Pay Slip components cost. IBA
expressed their total inability to accept the same as it is beyond the
paying capacity of the Banks.
IBA offered an improvement of 1% and agreed to improve their offer from
10% to 11%.
UFBU told it is inadequate. On being asked abouts expectations, it
asked for 25% increase on Pay Slip components instead of 11% offered by
IBA
Thus,
now bankers who were expecting / demanding 30% to 50% increase OR
parity with central government pay-scales should realize that maximum
demand by UFBU is 25%. Forget
about all Charter of Demands submitted in October 2012, which had all
sorts of high dreams. Now expect anything above 11% but below 25%. on
Pay Slip component.
Ads by Google
What Does Circular Reads
Summary / Remarks by AllBankingSolutions.com
As regards other issues discussed with the IBA in the last two rounds of discussions, IBA informed that they are favourably inclined to consider the demand of extending 100% DA for all pensioners and the same is awaiting the approval of the Government. On our demand for improvement in Family Pension, IBA's response was positive but they informed that the cost implication has to be properly worked out and Government's approval is necessary for the same. As regards updation of pension, IBA was apprehensive about the same since it involves substantial financial burden to the Banks. IBA also informed that our demand for extending appointment on compassionate grounds in the Banks on the lines of Government scheme is under the active and positive consideration of the Government and their decision is awaited.
Frankly speaking IBA has not given commitment on any of issues relating to 100% DA for all pensioners and improvement in family pension; and appointments on compassionate grounds.
However, as per UFBU version IBA is favourably inclined to consider demand of extending 100% DA for all pensioners. IBA also seems to have shown positive response to improvement in Family Pension. However, UFBU still needs to do lot of work as IBA has not committed anything and only shown positive response. Thus, a ray of hope continues for old retired bankers for 100% DA.
As far as updation of pension is concerned, there seems to be little hope due to financial implications.
With this, the talks ended inconclusively. Thereafter UFBU decided that since IBA has not come up with any adequate increase in their offer, further course of action would be taken shortly after mutual consultations amongst the Constituent Unions and also after meeting the Finance Minister in this regard.
Further developments would be informed to units in due course.
UFBU is unhappy and told that further course of action will be announced after mutual consultations and meeting with FM.
Thus, to conclude we can say there is again a stalemate. Next meeting for
negotiations is not announced as talks appears to have broken down as there is
wide gap between what is being demanded by UFBU and what is being offered by IBA.
UFBU is not able to decide what future course of action it needs to take.
Thus, UFBU has merely announced that it will wait for another meeting among
UFBU leaders and a meeting with FM. I
am afraid the meeting with FM too will more focus on stalling Nayak Committee
recommendations rather than on wage hike.
It again appears to be great tactics to buy maximum time as FM will be too busy
in next few weeks for preparation of budget and then meetings that follow the
budget. UFBU are unlikely to get time from FM (with burden of two portfolios -
defence and finance) to discuss this issue before budget. Thus, the next
course of action to be announced may take another SIX weeks. Another FOUR
weeks may be required for preparation of agitation / strike programme and
its notice period. Thus, Aam Banker should continue to lick his / her
wounds for another TEN weeks or so when they can expect any agitation programme
to start.
Great Strategy to befool the cadre - the true agenda of UFBU now does not seem
to be wage hike but stopping bank reforms. Art of delaying tactics can be best
learnt from UFBU leaders.
You can give your feedback / comments about this Article. Please give only relevant comments as irrelevant comments are
waste of time for yourself and our other readers.